Category Archives: In The News

American Values & the Survival of Our Republic & the Constitution

Is American political demographics changing?

Is there a new wave set to ride in upon the American landscape?

Are the DNC & RNC about to meet their maker?

Americans are tired and fed up with business as usual in Washington and are looking for a renewed kind of leadership. Leadership that is deepy rooted in the principles of our founding fathers & the Constitution.

We are continuely harrassed by the far left & also the moderate rights who claim we must move farther to the left to be accepted.

I reject that notion and millions more do also. We reject politicians that were elected on their promise of smaller government only to have them turn their backs on us once they have settled into their cozy Washington elitist world.

We are Silent No More and We are Here to Stay, So Get Used to It!

Our Voices ‘WILL’ Be Heard!

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about “American Values & the Survival of Our…“, posted with vodpod

 

Getting Sucked Into The Left Side of Life

I have to say, I am sooo disappointed in Sam Sewell and his latest actions only go to show how he has gotten sucked into the left side of life.

Thank you Phil of ‘TRSOF’ for bringing this to my attention today so I am able to correct my errors.

So with that, I also aplogize to my readers for the ‘bogus’ photo of the Kenyan Registration of birth that has was previously posted. I have since replaced it with the actual original that had been posted by Orly, but by the time I happened upon the scene, the original had already been hacked, doctored for the left’s Alinsky agenda and re-posted to discredit Orly.

And they are good at that. I have had my scrib account hacked and documents tampered with, so I know personally that the Obots are very well versed in this kind of corruption.

The ‘bogus’ one has changed the Doc # using the coded joke: 47,044 aka Obama 47; ‘O’ for Obama and 44 for the 44th president.

While they may clearly think this is hilarious, this issue is not. The most pressing fact is that Obama held dual citizenship at birth and even the framers who also held the same did not claim to be ‘natural born’ citizens, thus the grandfather clause: or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. 

Here are the 2 side by side. The original when blown up clearly shows K.F. Lavender with a certificate number of 47,644. The 1st is the original and the 2nd is the fake created by the Obamabots and Alinsky-ittes that was lightened, cleaned up and now proven to be the fake.

possibleBHOKenyanBC--18018714-03118

 Obamas_Birth_Certificate_png original posted by orly show kf lavender and 47644

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A wise man’s heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool’s heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2

  

National & State Officials: ‘Secure are Our Future Elections ‘NOW”

I am leaving this post up, however I can not believe Sam Sewell fell for the obot trick. And while his work thus far has been good, his time at Sentinel Radio has corrupted his sense of reason and he has become bias. So please do read the links posted, however, I do not endorsement the grand juries and especially the lynch mob growing at Sentinel Radio who have proven to be very biased and closed-minded.

It takes no great leap of intellect to know that our election system is fraught with flaws and loop-holes allowing for the most sinister of corruption and thus…

I keep an eye on Sam Sewell of ‘The Steady Drip’. His investigative ethics as an former intelligence officer are exemplary.

Last fall, Sam posted this most obscure tidbit or shall we say ‘bait’:

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

I am very eager to get some validation or followup on the below quoted information. I am also hoping that I am not compromising intelligence. I belong to AFIO and I am sensitive to such matters so I will be quick to remove this post if asked to do so by a legitimate authority.

In August I received a curious email. As a XXXXXX that covers international politics with a focus on Mideast affairs, XXX XXXXX gets a fair share of baseless tips and phony rumors. I ignore most of them and delete them unread. This one was a bit different. It came from a national security lawyer with extensive credentials and intelligence connections that checked out, and a phone number.
 
XXX XXXXX has been running a series of articles exploring the vagaries of Barack Obama’s birth and concealed documentation, and this was the jumping off point of the email which confirmed the claim that Obama was not born in Hawaii, that “Mossad are going with Mombassa” but “Proving Mombassa is not so easy, as NSIS in Nairobi are clamming up tight, as are MI6 in London, who have the original Mombassa file and full details of the birth.”

Today, Sam revealsa bit more to this earlier posting that pertains to the newly released Kenyan Registration of Birth of one Barack H. Obama II:

mombasa_copy04035Now pay close attention to this:

Ann filed for Divorce Jan. 20, 1964 (Inauguration Day – what are the odds?), and the date was set by the presiding judge for the trial to commence 30 days after Obama SR would have responded to his notification, sent to Cambridge, Mass (Cambridge – what are the odds? ).

I do believe we ‘DO’ have the smoking gun here folks and I have to say I ‘DO’ fear what the ramifications will be. Our elected officials, both at the state & national levels, were all asked to vet this information last fall, yet they brushed us off as ‘fringe’ and scolded us for following internet rumors.

This will ‘NOT’ go unnoticed in 2010 and every election there after and so I leave you with this video to mark this day in our history, the day that the final piece of the truth comes out, the truth that Obama can no longer escape from:

 

God Bless our Military & God Bless the Patriotic Retired Intelligence Officers Who Never Give Up Until The Job Is Done!

They Will Not Stand Down Until The ‘Usurper’ Is Removed From ‘We The People’s’ White House

“SEMPER FI” 

 

Is this really smoking gun of Obama’s Kenyan birth?

This from Phil at the ‘Right Side of Life’ bears repeating:

“I think I need to remind everyone once again that this is a claim that has yet to be substantiated, the authentication could potentially lead to the discovery of geninue documents regarding Mr. Obama’s background, and that this story is about a birth registration, not a birth certificate, certification, etc.”

 

 

 

mombasa_copy04035BORN IN THE USA?

 

Posted: August 02, 2009
11:55 am Eastern

 © 2009 WorldNetDaily

WASHINGTON – California attorney Orly Taitz, who has filed a number of lawsuits demanding proof of Barack Obama’s eligibility to serve as president, has released a copy of what purports to be a Kenyan certification of birth and has filed a new motion in U.S. District Court for its authentication.

 

You decide…full article w/  more detailed photos here

 

And this bears repeating from me:

The true fraud is that Obama was NEVER a ‘natural born citizen’ as defined by the framers of our Constitution.

 

Proof That E. F Lavender Worked for the British Government

Lavender 1Lavender 2H/T to Mario Apuzzo commenter Nick

Nick said…

On this new birth document, some critics are saying that it is a hoax because E.F. Lavender (a name appearing on the document) is a detergent product. However, here’s something interesting: http://ndpbeta.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/1536351/387756?zoomLevel=3

An old Australian newspaper (The Argus) from July 13, 1915. Zoom in on “Law Clerks’ Offer.” It talks about a man named E.F. Lavender. I’m not saying it’s the same man — after all, 1915 to 1961 is a 46 year gap — though theoretically it COULD be the same man. But anyway, the point is that Australia also has ties to England as did Kenya. The British monarch is still the Australian chief of state even today. So if there was a man in Australia named E.F. Lavender, who says there couldn’t be one in Kenya?

 

About That Single Payer System You Claim Won’t Happen

Don’t let them fool you, don’t let Johnson or Herseth-Sandlin(Obama’s new blue dog buddy) off the hook this month, this is what their goal is . . .

 

hat/tip:  Breitbart.com

Obama & Fukino, You Have Some More Splainin” to Do : UPDATES at Bottom

OK, I was going to drop the BC issue because it really does not matter as far as his qualifications go since he was British at birth by his own admission, however…

Today, Hawaii Dept of Health Director, Dr. Chiyome Fukino reported:

“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawai’i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai’i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai’i and is a natural-born American citizen,” Fukino said in a statement. “I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008, over eight months ago.”

How nice, now I have just one question for the Doctor and for Dear Leader:

“Obama was born Aug 4th and the Nordyke twins were born on Aug 5th, both at Kapiolani. Obama’s birth was registered Aug 8th and the Nordyke twins on Aug 11th. So how is it that Obama’s certificate number ends 10641 and the Nordyke twins are 10637 & 10638.”

I still maintain, no birth certificate is needed, however, the birthers who do deserve to know why all the lies and cover-ups.

JUST SHOW THEM THE DOCUMENT!!!

M1139416728

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

birth_certificate_5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PS..just noticed one other thing in the document number discrepancy. Obama’s says 151-1961-o10641 & Nordyke’s say 151-61-10637 & 151-61-10638. The official number as shown in the Nordyke twins only has 10 numbers, Obamas has 13. Kind of reminds me of his selective service records with conflicting document locator numbers that don’t match.

Remember Nixon? It was not the crime that got him, it was the COVER-UP!

PSS…I would like to thank the Honolulu Advertiser because we have been trying to get copies of the Nordyke twins birth certificates for over a year. Without your help, this fraud might have never been known.

PSSS…Oh, and about that address fraud, just go here and read the private investigators report. I will post the links later that show Orland S. Lefforge returned to Hawaii in 1954 and remained there. He was a professor in the English Dept and taught classes on….brace yourself….political speaking aka political speeches. What a hoot!

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Freepers reported this on 12/17/08:

Wisconsin State Journal 4/9/1951
Madison News Items in Brief
Debate at U.W.
“Two University of Hawaii students will debate with Wisconsin students at 8 pm Tuesday in the Agricultural hall auditorium on the subject “Resolved: That Hawaii Should be a Commonwealth”
Masaru Funa and Shunichi Kaimura will be the affirmative speakers from the University of Hawaii. Their coach is Henry L. Ewbank, son of speech Prof Henry L. Ewbank, Sr., at the University of Wisconsin. Negative speakers from Wisconsin will be Robert Hayes, Chetak and Richard Karson, West Bend. Moderator for the debate will be Orland Lefforge, former Hawaiian coach and now a student here.
I received confirmation from UW at Madison that Orland Lefforge was granted his Phd in Speech in 1953. From 1953 he seems to disappear.

He and his wife Thelma and children were the owners of 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy in 1961 and I am awaiting word from UH at Manoa as to when he returned to teach there. Something which just struck me this weekend was the interview “The Honolulu Advertiser” did with Nani Smethurst, the present owner of the address. She has the paperwork for the house and yet she didn’t recognize the Dunham name. As an archictect she would recognize the name and yet she didn’t, because the Lefforges owned the home, not the Dunhams.

From a blurb in another paper Lefforge didn’t teach for all that long at UH.

April 9, 1967 Cedar Rapids Gazette
“Washington Notebook”
“Orland Lefforge, Henry Giugni and Jack Teehan, running close to deadline for a reception for senate staff assistants, couldn’t find a cab.
They bummed a ride with a fellow in the office who was on his way home.
At the White House gate, the attendant asked the three, “Will your driver be coming back later or shall I show him where to wait?”
Which broke up everybody in the car.
At the wheel was the trio’s boss, Sen Daniel K. Inouye (D- Hawaii)”

(snip)

As I said I am still waiting to find out when he returned to teach at UH but it is definite he and Thelma and their three children were living at the birth announcement house in 1961.

(snip)

Star Bulletin – July 12

Thelma Young June 28, 2008 Thelma Young, 91, of Honolulu died. She was born in Trenton, N.J. She is survived by son Daniel Lefforge, daughters Andrea Harper and Mia Blake, three grandchildren and a great-grandchild. Private services.

Star Bulletin – July 28

Orland Scott Lefforge July 4, 2007 Orland Scott Lefforge, 91, of Honolulu, a University of Hawaii professor, died in Kaiser Medical Center. He was born in Pettisville, Ohio. He is survived by companion Thelma Young , son Daniel, daughters Andrea Harper and Mia Blake, brother Marian, three grandchildren and a great-grandchild. Services: 11 a.m. next Saturday at the courtyard of George Hall, University of Hawaii at Manoa. Casual attire.

When did Obama 1st post his COLB? And I wonder which of the Lefforge children is the real owner to the certificate number being used. Maybe someone ought to go have a visit with Sen. Inouye (D-HI) and get the inside scoop on his staff assistant Mr Orland S Lefforge.

More at Freepers:

There is a genealogy tree which indicates Andrea and Mia were adopted. Figuring it out Thelma would have been 43 when Daniel was born in 1960. Even trying to find information for the children as been frustrating! Birthdates listed for them are as follows:
Andrea 3/15/55
Mia 1959
Daniel 1960

“Birds of a feather, stick together” Especially in poilitics!

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Orland S. Lefforge in 2003

Orland S. Lefforge in 2003

 

Orland returned to the U of Hi, Monoa in 1954

he taught Political Speech

and was listed on the

U of Hi faculty roster

 in 1961.

 

 

 

OK, the amount of number discrepency has been solved, the state of Hawaii now uses the entire year and have added a ‘0’ to the beginning of the last set if digits, this still does not explain how he can have a number that is 3 births later than the twins whose birth was registered 3 days later than his.

1930 COLB

Selling America’s Birthright

 By Pat Boone

I got an e-mail from President Obama today. It had a heading at the top:

THE WHITE HOUSE
Washington

I must admit, I had – and still have – mixed feelings about it. Anytime you get a “personal” letter or e-mail from the president of the United States, it naturally seems important.

But since it was obviously a form letter, sent to several million other American voters, you quickly realize that the man whose name is at the end of the letter doesn’t know you at all. He couldn’t pick you out of a crowd of two. It’s a political ploy, only special in the sense that only modern technology makes this kind of mass (though “personal” seeming) communication possible.

It starts out “Dear Friend,” and it’s signed simply “Barack Obama.” I really doubt that Mr. Obama even saw or approved the letter, much less composed it. It was conceived and implemented by his team, very much the same technique he used seeking votes on the Internet. Nice, friendly, bullet-pointed – and completely, almost desperately, political.

Its clear purpose was to convince me to personally support his health care plan, and even “put these core principles of reform in the hands of your friends, your family, and the rest of your social network.” This is one of the main ways he got elected, through slick use of the Internet, getting ordinary citizens to literally go to work for him and to campaign for him and his agenda. Teddy Roosevelt could never have done this and even George Bush and his folks never thought of it. Slick as a whistle and maybe effective.

“Speechless: Silencing the Christians,” by Don Wildmon, lays out determined strategy of coalition of liberal secularists, homosexual activists and Fortune 500 companies

But what was he trying to sell me?

He said, “It’s time to fix our unsustainable insurance system and create a new foundation for health care security,” and then proposed to provide eight specific consumer protections. They sound good and reasonable on the surface. But I’d been studying up on his health care proposal, and had just read at least 50 ways his plan could never work. It would actually devastate our economy and change the fundamental relationship between citizens and government. We’d no longer be freeborn citizens who have a consensual government; our very physical bodies would be the wards of the state.

So it left a bad taste in my mouth.

It vividly brought to mind the Genesis 25 story of Jacob and Esau, sons of Isaac and grandsons of Abraham. Esau was a rugged outdoors guy who loved to hunt and fish, and cook and eat what he killed. His brother Jacob was more a “stay around home” guy, a “mild man, dwelling in tents.” He could well afford to take it easy, because Papa Isaac was wealthy. And Jacob’s mama was happy to do all the cooking for him. She even taught him how to cook some himself.

One day, while Jacob was practicing his cooking, brother Esau came in from the field, dog-tired. “Hey bro,” he asked, “Gimme some of that stew. It smells good, and I’m worn out and hungry.” Well, Jacob was something of a conniver, and he saw a chance to make a big, big score. “I’ll serve you up some of this delicious stew, my brother — if you’ll sell me your birthright, as of this day.”

According to the Bible account, Esau didn’t even think it over. “Hey, I’m so hungry I could die, and then what good would my ‘birthright’ be? You got yourself a deal, little brother. Pass me the stew.” So in that moment of temporary need, he gave up his future and all his father intended him to have.

He ate a big meal, filled his belly, and went his way. He didn’t realize till later what a complete fool he’d been – and he “cried with an exceedingly great and bitter cry.” As the Bible says, “he despised his birthright.”

for the rest of the story, continue here:  Selling America’s birthright

Shared via AddThis

Because He’s the Most Caring President Evah!

If he treats a so called close friend like this, how will he treat us once he has control of our healthcare?

afterbeers_PS-0436

Oh, for the days of ole’, when a gentleman was truly a gentleman.

bushgentleman

 

 

 

 

 

 

Obama’s Corrupt Propaganda Machine Strikes Again

Mirrored from www.naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com

Wall Street Journal Caught Spreading False Legal Propaganda Via James Taranto

propaganda

Yesterday, American journalism reached a new low when James Taranto of the Wall Street Journal published legal propaganda that appears to blatantly lie to readers.  In discussing the issues surrounding Obama’s birth to an alien father, Taranto added text to a US statute which does not contain such text.  Here is the offensive passage:

“Someone born overseas and after 1986, but otherwise in identical circumstances to Obama, would be a natural-born citizen thanks to a law signed by President Reagan.”

No such law exists.

The words “natural born citizen” do not appear in the statute discussed by Mr. Taranto.  In fact, the words “natural born citizen” do not exist in any US statute.  Those words only appear in the Constitution –  Article 2 Section 1 – and only as a requirement to be President.

The US code Taranto makes reference to is TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER III > Part I > § 1401 (g):

§ 1401. Nationals and citizens of United States at birth

The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:

(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years…

The statute does not use the words “natural born citizen”.

Mr. Taranto needs to get back to Hogwarts fast and try a new spell.  His magic wand didn’t add new text to the US Code overnight.

Had Mr. Taranto made the focus of his article the issue of whether persons who obtain citizenship at birth by statute are also natural born citizens for purposes of meeting the Presidential requirements of Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5, such a discussion would have been proper.  His legal analysis as stated in the article would be wrong, but stating such a question presented and taking a position thereto is a correct form of editorial.

But that’s not what Taranto has done.

Taranto and The Wall Street Journal have done something far more damaging and nefarious than simply mis-analyzing the law.  He’s written – and they’ve published – a piece of propaganda here which makes it appear as if the text of the law contains words which are not there.

Let’s call that what it is – propaganda.  They weren’t content to ask a legal question and honestly deal with both sides of the argument from a non-partisan and pure journalistic intent.  No.  This article is an attempt to trick readers into believing laws exist which do not exist.

The statute does not include the words “natural born citizen”.  Regardless, those who read Taranto’s article are left with the impression that the statute includes those words.

And that is journalistic evildoing personified.

Statutes that grant citizenship – at birth or later in life via naturalization – provide rescue to those people whose citizenship is not self evident at birth.  If you’re born in the US to parents who are citizens then you are a natural born citizen and you do not need a statute to create your citizenship which is natural and self evident.

Statutory citizenship does not give rise to natural born citizen status – which is not a right but a requirement to be President.  All citizens have the same rights, but not all “citizens” can be President.  Not even all “natural born citizens” can be President.  The Constitution put the requirements for President in the Document to exclude persons from eligibility, not include them.

Taranto’s article is a gauntlet thrown down in your face.  The fourth estate has signaled – through this blatant propaganda attack on the law – that it is willing to lie to your face – IN YOUR FACE – Amerika.

Perhaps all other measures to control this issue are failing. And perhaps my constant pessimism that this blog isn’t doing any good to wake people up is misguided.  Blatant propaganda tells me somebody somewhere is getting desperate to make this all go away.

The Wall Street Journal via propaganda agent James Taranto has taken a drastic course of action from which the point of no return is clearly mapped.  

We aint in Kansas anymore, people.