Constitutionally Speaking

Well, they have already tried the “white is black” in the so called stimulus that is not working out so well for them, so why not try a new pseudo for their deformed plan to force mandated government run health care on us.

Via WSJ: “They might as well try to argue that up is down. The analysis of the Democrats’ proposal by the Congressional Budget Office shows that it will not reduce government spending on health care.”

Now, not that this is anything new to them, they had a great teacher in Saul Alinsky:

What follows is for those who want to change the world from what it is to what they believe it should be. (snip) In this book we are concerned with how to create mass organizations to seize power

In the RedState article ” Mike Castle Ecounters Birthers“, Leon H Wolf states:

“However, even if we ignore the stark political reality that Obama is never, ever going to be chucked out of office (under any plan or mechanism) for this issue, what would be the end result if he were.  President Biden, that’s what.  Sorry, there is no provision in the Constitution for going back and re-doing the 2008 elections.And whatever you think of Obama as President, surely you wouldn’t prefer to have Joe Biden as our Chief of State?”

I can only assume that Leon was channeling “Leon the Moron”, his dubious inner leftist, because had Leon actually done his research, he would have found there are provisions that are clearly spelled out in the 20th Amendment:

20th Amendment, Section 3: If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.

What I would like to point out directly to you Leon, is the phrase “neither President or Vice President“. You see, what research has told us, is that if the President was never qualified to be on a ballot, then his entire ballot is corrupt and thus the vote must return to the people. There is legislation that spells out the steps very plainly and had the “LAW” been upheld back in 2008, we would have had a new election no later than mid April and we would be so much better off today. I think you would agree to the later or atleast I would hope.

So you see Leon, what you liberal conservatives who claim to be for the constitution, but lack the balls to actually put your pony into the fight, fail to do is write about the constitution with validity.

When you spew gutter based on your emotions that cover-up the real facts, you Leon, are nothing more than a wanna be, using cleverly disguised euphorisms for an instant personal high at the expense of innocent readers who believe they are getting real news with credible, corroborated facts.

I’ll be watching for a retraction from Leon in the very near future, lest it is his intention to mislead his readers.

************************************************************************************************************************

Suggested starter reading;

The Heritage Guide to the Constitution; The Federalist Papers; The Anti-Federalist Papers, the Congressional Minutes Archives and the Federalist Blog dot US

Breaking news from WND:

The “Certification of Live Birth” posted online and presented by Barack Obama as documentation of his reported Hawaiian birth doesn’t “prove” his birth alone, according to government officials interviewed by WND.

According to officials with the U.S. State Department, such a short-form birth document might – or might not – be accepted as documentation of a U.S. birth for a passport if it meets certain requirements. Their conclusion is that the law is “complicated.”

And state officials in Hawaii independently told WND that such documents are issued only when certain standards have been met.

But those requirements and standards do leave the door open that the COLB image does not, in fact, prove what it purports.

(snip)

Hawaii state Registrar Dr. Alvin Onaka told WND today that most birth records today stem from a hospital report and those for children not born in hospitals depend on other records, such as the pregnant mother’s prenatal exams, the statement of an attending midwife and a verification of the birth of a live child.

Other listings include a “foreign” birth or a “delayed” birth.

“We would not be issuing birth certificates of individuals not born in the state of Hawaii,” he said.

In fact, Hawaiian Health Director Chiyome Fukino previously made a public statement about the controversy:

“I, and Dr. Alvin Onaka have personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures,” Fukino’s statement said.

But the statement didn’t reveal what the document contains, nor has any clarification ever been released.

While Onaka documented the need for medical records and statements from a midwife, he did not cite any independent investigative procedures for a report that would be submitted by a midwife, and Hawaiian law specifically allows “an adult or the legal parents of a minor child” to apply to the health department and upon unspecified proof, be given the birth document.

The only requirement for proof cited in the law doesn’t address the birth of the child either, just “that the legal parents of such individual while living without Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal resident for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.”

According to Jerry Fuller and Mike Persons of the passport services division of the U.S. State Department, a document such as the online COLB could be acceptable to prove U.S. citizenship for the purposes of getting a passport if it contains a certain number of components, such as time and date of birth, location, name and others.

(snip)

Robert Klein Engler, who writes at Chronwatch-America.com, said he called the State Department to ask about obtaining a U.S. passport with only a “Certification of Live Birth.”

“I was told flat out, ‘No!'” he told WND.

read full article here

 Also, Rush chimed in today:

And then there is still that question over the legality of Obama’s Selective Service record:

ANYONE UP FOR A BET THAT GIBBSY DOESN’T GIVE LES A CHANCE FOR A QUESTION DURING THE WHITE HOUSE BRIEFING TOMORROW?