Preparedness vs Panic (UPDATED w/ new reference for research) NEW: 2ND UPDATE W/ TIMELINE and Analysis of SD STRAINS

In The News April 28, 2009

I have been following the flu viruses reported, going well back into last fall, when the report came out that google would be tracking all flu seaches via google search engine per request of the new Obama administration.

Why would our government want to be tracking flu searches? Could the reason be the 2 missing vials of live flu virus, one avian and the other was human flu virus (a deadly combination if they were ever to get mixed together) that went missing and went all but unreported in the MSM? The answer is unequivocally…YES.

Now, the MSM are still up to shenanigans by reporting this outbreak as swine flu, but if you go to the CDC & the WHO, they are both reporting the virus as a mix of all 3, swine, human and avian. Why are the MSM and the US Govt Officials covering up and misleading the public? Do you know what there may be to lose? Do you know what some might wish to gain? Let us not presume. Let us demand thorough investigation. Anything short of that is foolhardy.

The interview begins at approx 4:20 into the show after the musical opening:

Alexander S. Jones, who has been doing extensive research on what he describes as this man-made virus. Jones is one who predicted what is happening — and worse, in the very near future. Following is yesterday’s email, accredited to Mr. Jones (not the Alex Jones of the netradio program):

As many are aware now, the situation in Mexico is out of control. Doctors on the ground say a minimum of 200 are dead. The virus has clearly spread worldwide, including to the UK , via aircraft, carried by an infected crew, with ~220 people on the aircraft having left or made connecting flights, which means the virus will undoubtedly spread across Europe.

It is my belief that we have cases of swine, cases of avian and also cases of human flu, but with them all in the air and the number of deaths being reported in Mexico City, it is my belief that yes, there is a strain that has morfed into a deadly strain.

PANIC….ABSOLUTELY NOT. But please be prepared. Read, research and take precautions and then give it over to God.

  • Swine Flu Bio-Weapon? — Allan Erickson’s blog
  • Deadly Bird Flu/Human Flu Mixture Sent To Other Labs By Accident— Sentinel Radio blog
  • CDC to Mix Avian, Human Flu Viruses in Pandemic Study— CIDRAP, Jan 14, 2004
  • Soros-Backed Socialists Lean on Obama to Hurry Up Government-Run “Health Care” — Wes Vernon, 4/27/2009
  • Swine Flu Crisis: Secretary Napolitano Lacks Credibility — Jim Kouri, 4/28/2009

    • UPDATE: NEW REFERENCES

  • Vaccines as Biological Weapons? Live Avian Flu Virus Placed in Baxter Vaccine Materials Sent to 18 Countries— NaturalNews.com, March 3, 2009
  • An Interview with Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger, M.D., Ph.D.; Chief of Molecular Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, D.C., (the Frankensteinian doctor who dug up the 1918 flu, with the DoD) NinthDay.com, May, 1998

    • AP reporting early this evening: “the number of flu cases in the US has now more than quadrupled in just a few days, many of them are being reported as a different flu. They are NOT swine flu, but a new strain and now the Obama administration and CDC are considering renaming the virus”

    Just as Alexander predicted, hmmmm. Me thinks they know more than they are releasing.

    UPDATE#2: MORE RESEARCH AND TIMELINE SHOWING THE US GOVT KNEW WELL IN ADVANCE OF OBAMA’S VISIT TO MEXICO THAT THERE WAS A PROBLEM. Also, research is leaning towards this NOT deriving from a livestock facility as is being reported by the media:

  • Epidemic Influenza and Vitamin D — Medical News Today
  • HealthMap; Global Disease Alert Map
  • Greg’s Blog : Analysis Shows Asian, European and U.S. Sources in Swine Flu April 28, 2009 update— Greg Contreras asks: “where the hell did it get all these genes from?” Phylogenic trees of the current strain in the US…Researchers are puzzled over the origins and spread of the current H1N1 human borne influenza and that has health officials around the world worried.The current virus mixes an existing triple combination of human, avian and swine influenza identified in 1998 with two new swine virus genes from Asia and Europe, both of human origin. Because of its novelty, humans are unlikely to have any immunity to it. The current seasonal flu vaccine targets a different H1N1 strain and isn’t likely to offer any protection.Indeed, according to a report in Recombinomics, March 24, 2009, the failure rate of the H1N1 virus seen in Rapid City, South Dakota was as much as 50% among those vaccinated for influenza. It’s not clear whether those new virus cases, as the instant virus was only sent for classification in mid-March. . . a “MUST” read 
  • Swine Flu in Mexico- Timeline of Events — Biosurveillance blog

    •  

    •  

    US Strain

    the phylogenic tree of the N1 protein (neuraminidase) of the current U.S. strain. Both figures show the complex origins of the virusphylogenic tree of the H1 protein (hemagglutinin) of the U.S. strain of the current influenza virus

     

     

     

     

     

    phylogenic tree of the H1 protein (hemagglutinin) of the U.S. strain of the current influenza virus

    phylogenic tree of the H1 protein (hemagglutinin) of the U.S. strain of the current influenza virus

     

     

    The Lighter Side of Life…Sometimes Humor is the Best Medicine

    In The News April 28, 2009

    The AP reports that Fox has decided to stick with its regular line-up on Wednesday, meaning it won’t air President Obama’s prime-time news conference marking his 100th day in office. Instead, viewers will see an episode of “Lie to Me.”

    ABC, CBS, and NBC will be airing the press conference.

    UPDATE: Ladue Pundit posted this clarification: Oh, NBC, CBS and ABC will also be airing “Lie to Me,” the Obama version.

    US Government Organizational Chart

    Action Item, Contact Your State Senators & Representatives, Contact Your US Senators & Congresswoman, Economy, In The News, South Dakota State Legislation, US Congress Legislation, Youth Educational Material April 28, 2009
    344_o_chart2

    When Harry Truman left the White House he was asked how it felt to leave the White House and become an ordinary citizen, Harry replied:

     “I’m glad for the promotion.”

    Every one of us citizens outranks any employee of the government including the President. Don’t ever forget that because our employees have forgotten it.

    America Grand Jury: “Pouring Oil on Troubled Waters”

    In The News, Youth Educational Material April 27, 2009

    Excerpted from: “America Grand Jury: “Pouring Oil on Troubled Waters”

    Although the laws may vary from state to state, Grand Juries are viewed the way United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia sees them,

    “In fact, the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people.”

      United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia ruled in the case of United States vs. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 at 48 (1992):

    “Rooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history, Hannah v. Larche, 363 US 420, 490 (1960) with J. Frankfurter concurring in result, the Grand Jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the three branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right.”

    Clearly stated: The Grand Jury is a separate and equal Constitutional power. The Grand Jury is not a tool for government to use against its citizens.

    There are not going to be any lynch parties for politicians. As much as we might mention ‘torches and pitchforks,’ the only revolution I support and the only revolutions supported by the leadership of the Grand Jury movement is a revolution as defined by the U. S. Constitution. Our forefathers had the wisdom to provide a way for citizens to redress their grievances in a peaceful way.

    God Bless Our Troops, God Bless America and…

    Action Item, In The News, Youth Educational Material April 26, 2009

    God help us from those running our country right now, those who are in the same mind-set as the left-wing “Bush Legacy Bus” workers/supporters that did everything, including voter fraud to get Obama elected to destroy our Republic and desicrate our Constitution.

    The bus workers/supporters can not even answer simple questions to soldiers who have served in Iraq and Afghanstan that pertain to the war and it’s success, they can only spew left-wing talking points. The sponsors of the Bush Legacy Bus are the left-wing Obama supporters: Americans United For Change, SEIU, AFSCME, Move On, Acorn and others.

    Vodpod videos no longer available.

    more about “God Bless Our Troops, God Bless Ameri…“, posted with vodpod

     

    Vets For Freedom    Founding Bloggers

    Our Constitutional Republic is Now Officially Broken and A Hard Tyranny is Upon Us!

    Action Item, Contact Your State Senators & Representatives, Contact Your US Senators & Congresswoman, In The News, US Congress Legislation, Youth Educational Material April 26, 2009

    How do you tell a communist? Well, it’s someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It’s someone who understands Marx and Lenin  ~  Ronald Reagan

    liberty_tyrannyLiberty and Tyranny : The truth as to what is to come if more do not wake up and help us to take action. Congressman Ryan, WI, joins Mark and later Mark is joined by a surgeon who talks openly about the prospects of a lack of qualified and experienced doctors in Americas future under a Nationalized Health system. Mark also goes into the failed housing crisis and reveals uncovered clips of DC elected official who can no longer hide behind the fact that proof has been uncovered about Congresses cover-up of the housing financial crisis and how they are to blame for it.

     Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.  ~  Ronald Reagan

     ***********************************************************************************************************************

    I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.
    Thomas Jefferson (1743 – 1826)

    Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have … The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases.
    Thomas Jefferson (1743 – 1826)

    The worst thing you can do for those you love is the things they could and should do themselves.
    Abraham Lincoln (1809 – 1865)

    **************************************************************************************************************************

    The following video is very informative as to how most common patriotic citizens who don’t have their head in the sand feel about what is happening. The Lady kicking the video protest off, with “The Kenya Boy” comment is a naturalized U.S. Citizen, native of the Philippines & was active in “People Power” the 1986 Non-Violent Filipino Protests that drove the Dictator Ferdinand Marcos from Power. 

    You can go to http://www.thesteadydrip.blogspot.com for information on the American Grand Jury  http://americangrandjury.org/, now underway. I believe there is room for more jurors.

    I encourage you to read thru my past posts and also visit the DECALOGOS site for specific information pertaining the the usurpation of the office of POTUS, specific legislation that will infringe and desecrate our religious freedoms and also international(UN) treaties that are proposed that will in effect limit a parents rights as to what and how they teach religion to their children, but also treaties that would have adverse, tragic affects on our clergy.

    For additional Constitutional information from a former US Ambassador who served under Reagan, please visit the Loyal to Liberty site.

    God Bless and be with you as we work to restore our country and Constitution to a state of a Republic under constitutional law, not a democracy under tyranny from government and it’s mob rule mentality.

    Why the Law is Foreign to Ginsberg

    In The News, Youth Educational Material April 26, 2009 1 Comment

    April 26, 2009

    Why the Law is Foreign to Ginsberg

    By Selwyn Duke

     

    There is an old saying, “A man who is capable of deceiving only others is not nearly as dangerous as a man who is capable of deceiving himself.”  Truer words were never spoken.  When a person lies, he is deceiving others about reality, but at least knows he is engaging in deception.  But when someone rationalizes — which is when you lie to yourself — he is truly lost.  He then not only bends reality for others as a by-product of bending it for himself, but he can render untruths without having to lie.  This is because a lie is when he tells an untruth knowing it’s untrue.  It’s much like when the ever-prevaricating George Costanza character on Seinfeld gave his advice for beating a polygraph machine, “just remember . . . it’s not a lie if you believe it.”

    I think of this when I hear Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader-Ginsberg tout the use of foreign law by American judges sworn to uphold the Constitution — that would be our constitution. Speaking about this recently at Ohio State University’s Moritz College of Law, she said,
    “I frankly don’t understand all the brouhaha lately from Congress and even from some of my colleagues about referring to foreign law [when handing down court rulings] . . . .”
    Well, you know what?  I believe her.  She and her fellow travelers really don’t understand.  That is, they don’t grasp the correct legal philosophy well enough to understand what they’re rejecting.
    Note that I called the legal philosophy “correct” and not “strict constructionism,” and for good reason.  When you call it correct, it follows that other positions are incorrect.  But what is the other side of the coin of constructionism?  It would be living-document legal philosophies.  To accept these categorizations implies that we just have a bunch of different credible perspectives on constitutional law, and who is to say what is correct?  Call it, legal relativism.  But more on this in a moment.
     
    At her speech at Moritz College, Ginsberg served notice that — like so many in legal circles today — she is in fact very confused about her role on the bench.  As an example of this, Adam Liptak at The New York Times tells us,
    “She added that the failure to engage foreign decisions had resulted in diminished influence for the United States Supreme Court.
     
    The Canadian Supreme Court, she said, is ‘probably cited more widely abroad than the U.S. Supreme Court.’ There is one reason for that, she said: ‘You will not be listened to if you don’t listen to others.'”
     
    This is a striking statement, and it vindicates something I’ve long believed.  I once wrote that part of the problem with our judges is that they’re not content to just be judges.  A judge is much like a referee at a baseball game.  It’s not his place to make or alter the rulebook (Constitution); his is simply to determine whether or not it has been violated. His like or dislike of a rule shouldn’t come into play.
     
    Yet today we have judges who would be kings. They’re not satisfied to just referee; that’s too small a role for them.  They want to be agents of activism, molders of men, shapers of society — and they want the ego satisfaction attending such status.  They want to be respected by their peers around the world, fellow members of the global judicial class. This is evidenced in Ginsberg’s statements. Why should she care if the Canadian Supreme Court is cited more than ours?  Popularity doesn’t equate to perspicacity.  After all, rap stars are far more popular than the most sublime moral philosophers.  And, as far whether or not foreigners listen to her court goes, here’s a newsflash: It matters not to normal Americans whether they do or not.  They’re not governed by American law; thus, our judges’ rulings may be irrelevant to them.  And foreign rulings should certainly be irrelevant to our judges.
     
    Thus, it seems that these things matter to Ginsberg because she isn’t satisfied with her role (a common failing of man).  She wants prestige and respect; she wants to set trends.  Perhaps she should have started a cult.  I hear there’s some land available in northwestern Guyana.
     
    Yet living-document justices are comforted in their misfeasance by rationalizations they conjure up to justify it.  One that Ginsberg has used is to criticize the view that the Constitution is “stuck in time.”  But she has it wrong.  It is not stuck in time but stuck in law.  Law can be changed through legal measures — in the case of the Constitution, the amendment process — but until then it’s supposed to be “stuck.”  The alternative to being stuck in law is being subject to the caprice of those with greater power.  That would mean that you could appear before a judge and he could rule based on whim or that a policeman could arrest you because he believed he had just experienced an epiphany about what the law should be.  In other words, this thinking is no different from the rule of kings, where a Herod could deliver John the Baptist’s head on a plate to please his wife.  It is why G.K. Chesterton said, “There are only two ways of governing: by a rule and by a ruler.”  It is why we should have “the rule of law” and not the rule of lawyers. 
     
    And this is why some of us have likened our Supreme Court to a de facto oligarchy.  After all, on what basis does an oligarchy rule?  Its members decide guided by nothing more than the dictates of their own consciences.  So people can put as much lipstick on this pig as they want.  They can wrap their living-document legal philosophy in a million pseudo-intellectual arguments.  But, at the end of the day, it boils down to might makes right.  When justices depart from constitutional constraints, they cannot be voted out of office or fired.  The only thing constraining them then is their own consciences and the regard of their overseas peers — just as with an oligarchy
    This is why I would have far more respect for someone who overtly defies the law (think Martin Luther King and civil disobedience) and simply refuses to comply.  For he is deceiving neither himself nor others.  He is simply saying that the law is wrong, that it violates a higher law and that it’s the duty of all good people to defy it.  It is the difference between an open declaration of war and the use of subterfuge and subversion.
       
    This brings us to a question.  If Supreme Court Justices can rule contrary to the letter and spirit of the supreme law of the land on the basis that the Constitution is not “stuck in time,” why can lower courts not apply the same reasoning to what is called “settled law” (areas where the Supreme Court has interpreted the Constitution “definitively”)?  After all, how can law ever be “settled” if it can never be viewed as “stuck”?  Why can a lower court not say, “Well, sure, the Supreme Court ruled that way five years ago, but times are a-changin’ fast. The law has a different meaning today”?  If the Black Robes won’t be constrained by the Constitution, why should others be constrained by their unconstitutional precedents? 
           
    We now come to the supreme arrogance of our oligarchs-cum-jurists.  For their living-law philosophy isn’t for all, is it?  It’s not for the citizen; for him law is stuck in time.  It’s not for the cop on the beat; interpretation isn’t his luxury. It’s not for the lower-court judge; for him precedent is to be pre-eminent.  It’s not even for the president, for the laws he signs are subject to Supreme Court judgments.  And judgments based on what?  Not the Constitution, obviously.  It is again merely their own judgment. 
     
    This raises the question of why we should respect the rulings of usurpers.  If they will not view the Constitution as being stuck in law, why should we view the law as being stuck in courts?  Are the dictates of black-robed oligarchs to be viewed as the only immutable elements in an ever-changing universe of laws?  Oh, ignoring court rulings would lead to a breakdown in the rule of law and this isn’t a good thing?
     
    Exactly.
     
    The point is that activist judges undermine the rule of law by setting an example of contempt for it.  Others are then placed in the position of asking what adherence to the rule of law really means.  Should they defer to court judgments made by those who don’t view themselves as constrained by law?  Or, should they rather use their own judgment — as the justices are doing — as to the real meaning of the supreme law of the land, the Constitution?
    This is what living-document legal rationalizations breed.  And it is why I’ve often said that all our designations for jurists, such as “constructionist” and “pragmatist,” are nonsense.  Because, really, there are only two kinds of justices: Good justices and bad justices.  Good ones do their job and abide by the Constitution.  Bad ones lawyer the law.
     
    Hey, maybe Ginsberg and her fellow travelers should just be honest and boil this down to its bare essence. They could quote infamous occultist Aleister Crowley and say, “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.”

    Let Us Not Forget…

    Youth Educational Material April 24, 2009

    For many, the following video will seem like it was just yesterday and for those too young to remember, I share with you a very special piece of our contry’s history. The second video goes back much further to a time in our nation’s history where Americans faith and resolve were tested in ways we can not even imagine. These are two pieces of history that truly reflect the American Faith, Hope, Resolve and Patriotsm. We are blessed to have these pieces of history as they will always continue to guide our nation for an even more prosperous tomorrow.

    How do you tell a communist? Well, it’s someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It’s someone who understands Marx and Lenin  ~  Ronald Reagan

     

     


    Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.  ~  Ronald Reagan

    Deuteronomy 4:39-40

    Therefore know this day, and consider it in your heart, that the Lord Himself is God in heaven above and on the earth beneath; there is no other. You shall therefore keep His statutes and His commandments which I command you today, that it may go well with you and with your children after you, and that you may prolong your days in the land which the Lord your God is giving you for all time.

    And Thus A Generated Crisis Begins?

    Action Item, Contact Your State Senators & Representatives, Contact Your US Senators & Congresswoman, Economy, In The News, South Dakota State Legislation, US Congress Legislation April 24, 2009

    CDC Says It’s Too Late to Confine Swine Flu Outbreak

    The Obama Administration Currently Has No Plan to Close the Border–
    The Center for Disease Control and Prevention announced today that it is already too late to contain the swine flu outbreak in the US.
    Alert.net reported:

    The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said on Friday it was too late to contain the swine flu outbreak in the United States.

    CDC acting director Dr. Richard Besser told reporters in a telephone briefing it was likely too late to try to contain the outbreak, by vaccinating, treating or isolating people.

    “There are things that we see that suggest that containment is not very likely,” he said.

    At least 8 cases of H1N1 have been identified in California and Texas.

     

    It’s not like some that don’t like America very much haven’t thought of using Mexico to launch the attack or use the lax border security to sneak it in…and the fact that a congressional panel has been discussing this heavily and have information that was released in Dec 2008 that the threat is very real and not far off. Now we have a threat that there is no vaccine for? This is all too suspect to one who has done as much research as I have.

    Did You Catch That?

    In The News, Youth Educational Material April 21, 2009

    Ambassador Alan Keyes , a Constitutional Scholar speaks on Religion and the Constitution . . . 5 min long