OK, I just couldn’t help myself when I saw the clip of Sanchez going off on cencerned citizens just wanting to know the truth, so here is some fun for for us at his expense for a change.
HAPPY WEDNESDAY!
Category Archives: In The News
RedState’s Writer Leon H. Wolf Doesn’t Know His Constitution, Misleads His Readers
In the RedState article ” Mike Castle Ecounters Birthers“, Leon H Wolf states:
“However, even if we ignore the stark political reality that Obama is never, ever going to be chucked out of office (under any plan or mechanism) for this issue, what would be the end result if he were. President Biden, that’s what. Sorry, there is no provision in the Constitution for going back and re-doing the 2008 elections.And whatever you think of Obama as President, surely you wouldn’t prefer to have Joe Biden as our Chief of State?”
I can only assume that Leon was channeling “Leon the Moron”, his dubious inner leftist, because had Leon actually done his research, he would have found there are provisions that are clearly spelled out in the 20th Amendment:
20th Amendment, Section 3: If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.
What I would like to point out directly to you Leon, is the phrase “neither President or Vice President“. You see, what research has told us, is that if the President was never qualified to be on a ballot, then his entire ballot is corrupt and thus the vote must return to the people. There is legislation that spells out the steps very plainly and had the “LAW” been upheld back in 2008, we would have had a new election no later than mid April and we would be so much better off today. I think you would agree to the later or atleast I would hope.
So you see Leon, what you liberal conservatives who claim to be for the constitution, but lack the balls to actually put your pony into the fight, fail to do is write about the constitution with validity.
When you spew gutter based on your emotions that cover-up the real facts, you Leon, are nothing more than a wanna be, using cleverly disguised euphorisms for an instant personal high at the expense of innocent readers who believe they are getting real news with credible, corroborated facts.
I’ll be watching for a retraction from Leon in the very near future, lest it is his intention to mislead his readers.
************************************************************************************************************************
Suggested starter reading;
The Heritage Guide to the Constitution; The Federalist Papers; The Anti-Federalist Papers, the Congressional Minutes Archives and the Federalist Blog dot US
Obama 44th President A FRAUD just as Chester Arthur 21st President was a FRAUD Bumped for educational purposes for RedState Readers
OBAMA LIED, CONGRESS DENIED, THE CONSTITUTION DIED!!!
Imagine, a US Supreme Court Justice confirmed to sanitize the indiscretions of an ineligible president. Well, imagine no further as it seems American history has already written this scenerio…
In early December 2008, Leo Donofrio discovers that Obama has pulled a Chester Arthur while he was researching the history of the birth of all past American Presidents
This is an amazing piece of history that has been very well hidden..UNTIL NOW!!!
Talk about a mind blower. All cases thus far, whether they had gone to the US Supreme Court or to state Supreme Courts have been denied, There has absolutely “NO” cases heard on their merits, they have all been denied without opinion or for lack of standing.
There is a cover-up here of EXTREME MAGNITUDE that includes the US Supreme Court.
WE MUST BE HEARD, WE MUST KEEP SHOUTING AT THE TOP OF OUR LUNGS BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE AND SOTOMAYOR IS CONFIRMED!!!
read Leo’s complete research here:
UPDATED 3X: BREAKING NEWS: US State Dept says “Certification of Live Birth” posted online lacks proof of birth on US soil; UPDATED w/ video of Obama fraud Selective Service Document by Breitbart TV, Obama tells ABC he signed up for Selective Service a YR before it was re-implemented
Breaking news from WND:
The “Certification of Live Birth” posted online and presented by Barack Obama as documentation of his reported Hawaiian birth doesn’t “prove” his birth alone, according to government officials interviewed by WND.
According to officials with the U.S. State Department, such a short-form birth document might – or might not – be accepted as documentation of a U.S. birth for a passport if it meets certain requirements. Their conclusion is that the law is “complicated.”
And state officials in Hawaii independently told WND that such documents are issued only when certain standards have been met.
But those requirements and standards do leave the door open that the COLB image does not, in fact, prove what it purports.
(snip)
Hawaii state Registrar Dr. Alvin Onaka told WND today that most birth records today stem from a hospital report and those for children not born in hospitals depend on other records, such as the pregnant mother’s prenatal exams, the statement of an attending midwife and a verification of the birth of a live child.
Other listings include a “foreign” birth or a “delayed” birth.
“We would not be issuing birth certificates of individuals not born in the state of Hawaii,” he said.
In fact, Hawaiian Health Director Chiyome Fukino previously made a public statement about the controversy:
“I, and Dr. Alvin Onaka have personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures,” Fukino’s statement said.
But the statement didn’t reveal what the document contains, nor has any clarification ever been released.
While Onaka documented the need for medical records and statements from a midwife, he did not cite any independent investigative procedures for a report that would be submitted by a midwife, and Hawaiian law specifically allows “an adult or the legal parents of a minor child” to apply to the health department and upon unspecified proof, be given the birth document.
The only requirement for proof cited in the law doesn’t address the birth of the child either, just “that the legal parents of such individual while living without Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal resident for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.”
According to Jerry Fuller and Mike Persons of the passport services division of the U.S. State Department, a document such as the online COLB could be acceptable to prove U.S. citizenship for the purposes of getting a passport if it contains a certain number of components, such as time and date of birth, location, name and others.
(snip)
Robert Klein Engler, who writes at Chronwatch-America.com, said he called the State Department to ask about obtaining a U.S. passport with only a “Certification of Live Birth.”
“I was told flat out, ‘No!'” he told WND.
read full article here
Also, Rush chimed in today:
And then there is still that question over the legality of Obama’s Selective Service record:
ANYONE UP FOR A BET THAT GIBBSY DOESN’T GIVE LES A CHANCE FOR A QUESTION DURING THE WHITE HOUSE BRIEFING TOMORROW?
Sotomayor Confirmation Hits Speed-Bump
Senate Republicans have successfully slowed down the confirmation process for Sotomayor!
Keep up the calls and letters…they are working.
**************************************************************************************************************************
”In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person’s becoming in every facet an American and nothing but an American…There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag… We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language… and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.”
Theodore Roosevelt 1907
UPDATED w/ Video: The AP Has Reported That Obama Was Listed as Barry Soetoro
SNAP SHOT OF NY TIMES OP-ED FEB 24, 2008 THAT WAS IGNORED BY MOST AND THE AUTHOR WASN’T GOING TO GO OUT OF HIS WAY TO POINT OUT THE OBVIOUS HE HAD LEARNED!
Obama wants to see and control our medical records, but he still refuses to release his…
Why all the secrecy? Afraid of more lies exposed would be the logical conclusion since Sanjay Gupta accepted the Surgeon General’s position, then later backed out.
WND has another update:
One of the little-explored issues relating to the controversy over Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president under the U.S. Constitution’s demand for a “natural born” citizen in that post is the impact of his move to Indonesia as a child.
(snip)
The AP has reported that Obama was listed as Barry Soetoro while a child attending school as a citizen of Indonesia and his religion listed as Islam.
(snip)
One WND reader whose name is being withheld because he is a private individual reported when he adopted his wife’s daughter from a previous relationship in Asia and brought the family to the United States, he was given a “certificate of birth” from the state of Kansas for his daughter.
However, the document cites specifically, “This Certificate is not evidence of United States Citizenship.”
(snip)
Some of the challenges to Obama’s presidency contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.
From my research on dual citizenship:
The primary author of the citizenship clause, Sen. Jacob M. Howard (elected as a Whig to the Twenty-seventh Congress (March 4, 1841-March 3, 1843); elected as a Republican to the United States Senate to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Kinsley S. Bingham; reelected in 1865 and served from January 17, 1862, to March 3, 1871), said during the drafting:
“The word jurisdiction, as here employed, ought to be construed so as to imply a full and complete jurisdiction on the part of the United States, coextensive in all respects with the constitutional power of the United States, whether exercised by Congress, by the Executive, or by the Judicial Department; that is to say, the same jurisdiction in extent and quality as applies to every citizen of the United States.”
When we look further into the study of the 14th Amendment’s drafting, we find a ruling from US Attorney General, George Williams (1865 to 1871 Williams served as United States Senator from Oregon. In 1871 he was a member of the commission to settle the Alabama claims from the Treaty of Washington. December 14, 1871-1875; Attorney General of the United States). George was a US Senator at the time of the drafting of the 14th Amendment:
“The word “jurisdiction” under the 14th Amendment “must be understood to mean absolute and complete jurisdiction, such as the United States had over its citizens before the adoption of this amendment. “Political and military rights and duties” do not pertain to anyone else.”
Essentially, what this means is that in order to be a “citizen” under the 14th Amendment, one must renounce any other allegiances so that their US citizenship is solely under the “jurisdiction” of the United States. In fact, controversy at the time due to dual allegiances was so great that Congress, in a joint congressional report on June 22, 1874 said:
“The United States have not recognized double allegiance”
read the full WND article here
Thune: Just Say “NO” to Sotomayor
“Thank You Senator Thune” for standing with ‘We the People”
Listen to Sen. Thune’s address here: DF138907720
12 Million Illegals: We Don’t Need No “Stinkin’ Amnesty”, Cuz We Get Free Health Care Under the Law
Reported in Newsmax on Sunday:
Democrats moved one step closer to giving free health insurance to the nation’s estimated 12 million illegal aliens when they successfully defeated a Republican-backed amendment, offered by Rep. Dean Heller, R-Nev., that would have prevented illegal aliens from receiving government-subsidized health care under the proposed plan backed by House Democrats and Barack Obama.
The House Ways and Means Committee nixed the Heller amendment by a 26-to-15 vote along straight party lines, and followed this action by passing the 1,018-page bill early Friday morning by a 23-to-18 margin, with three Democrats voting against the plan.
The Democratic plan will embrace Obama’s vision of bringing free government medical care to more than 45 million uninsured people in America — a significant portion of whom are illegal aliens.
This corroborates the Mark Levin caller from a couple of weeks back who had attended a La Raza meeting on health care. She was very upset at what Sen. Manendez’s staffer, sent to speak on his behalf, was saying. Take a quick 4 min to listen for yourself:
“If a Nation Expects to Be Ignorant and Free, in a State of Civilization, It Expects What Never Was and Never Will Be”
We are running our of time folks. I am urging all to act because complacency is “NOT” an option lest you rather be ruled by a “mob”:
Just for you leftists out there, what Jefferson was trying to say here is, you can’t be both stupid and free. This is the fly in your ointment friends. You think you can be stupid and irresponsible AND free. But you can’t… You think that freedom belongs to the spineless thief, but it doesn’t.
You think you can use a democratic process to force others to accept responsibility for your ignorance, but you can’t.
Oh sure, you can cast your vote on this basis and even elect a president and congress, who will seat a Supreme Court on this basis. But in the end, one of two things will happen. Either those who earned the gold you seek to steal, will take their gold and leave you holding your empty sack of broken promises, – or – you will trade your individual freedom for a pittance of “free stuff” from the public trough. You can be stupid, or you can be free, but you can’t be both…
In the end, there is no way to be both stupid and free! Jefferson knew this, Obamanation doesn’t.
“A democracy is nothing more than mob rule,
where fifty-one percent of the people
may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.”
read the full article by CFP here, then get to them calls to the Senate on Monday, the confirmation vote for Sotomayor is scheduled for Tuesday around 10:30am-ish.
Sotomayor: “Constitution is a “Timeless” Document That Was Written to Take Us “Generations & Decades” Into the Future
It is day 2 of the confirmation hearings and I have to say, not since the Thomas confirmation hearings have I been so glued to the debate because of its impact on our future as well as all generations to come.
Now, while some say that Sotomayor’s confirmation will not really have an impact on the overall balance of the court, I couldn’t disagree more. Sotomayor’s history is fact to that and also the recent interviews of Ginsburg & Breyer are very disturbing in the fact that for the 1st time, we could actually have a Supreme Court so radically balanced in favor of the progressive/statist agenda. A balance unequally in favor of the possibility of the statists/progressives getting many of their unconstitutional social programs deemed constitutional under the guise of the 14th amendment.
One answer by Sotomayor has really stood out to me thus far today. In a response to Senator Hatch, Sotomayor claimed:
The Constitution is a timeless document, written with such thought as to address every issue that may come before the Supreme Court for generations and decades to come, so it is a Supreme Court Justices duty to always look to the original intent of the framers at the time the Constitution was written.
OK, let’s do that, let’s bring a hypothetical to the Court. A hypothetical that could very well be in front of them very soon.
Imagine it is 2008, 2012, 2016, 2020, 2024, 2028, 2032, 2036, 2040 or 2044, etc.
A good looking young person arises from nowhere, or maybe has served in another elected office with less stringent qualifications, to become a candidate for President. The candidate is the child of a well-known anti-American, anti-Democracy touting parent from say Cuba, Venezuela or even possibly Iran, Saudi Arabia or Egypt. From a country that is against everything our Constitution stands for and despises the freedoms it allows its citizens.
Also, imagine that all major political parties put forth several candidates who are also, under the qualifications of Article II, not qualified to hold the office of President and imagine even a non-major party candidate, who is not even an American as he is here on a green card from Nicaragua, is allowed on the ballots in atleast a half a dozen states.
Now as a child, one of the candidates, though having one American parent, was taken to live in the foreign parent’s native land and made to learn and adhere to the laws of that regime only to return to live in communities that are steep in the tendencies of the regime of that foreign parent.
When the child grows up, he/she seeks out like minded individuals and begins working with them to promote the political agenda they were raised in. Promoting and teaching that this agenda is a much better way and thus it is that candidates platform to “fundamentally change” the structure of our Republic. The candidate campaigns that it is dire to push through unconstitutional socialistic programs in the guise of the redistributive inactions taken in prior history. Redistributive action that they felt that they were owed and thus use the 14th amendment as their premise to a favorable outcome on their part.
Would you be willing to accept an heir of the Castro family, the Chavez family, or possibly even an heir of the Mahmoud Ahamadinejad family as your President or Commander in Chief? A President/CINC born with the possibility that, that they held dual citizenship at the time of their birth. A President/CINC that had spent their most impressionable years living and studying the ways of their foreign parent’s beliefs, the same beliefs their American parent has adopted?
If you say “NO”, then you are agreeing with me and thus agreeing to the fact that to be a “natural born citizen” under Article II, Section I, Clause V of the Constitution and the original intent of the framers that both parents must be citizens prior to the birth of the immediate candidate/President in question. (see article on the intent of the framers of our constitution )
If you say “YES”, then I can only suggest that you might like trying to find some property in one of those repressive countries and begin packing since you like their way of life so much.
The precedence being set forth, in the lack of any court including the Supreme Court, until yesterday, agreeing to address this issue, just goes to show the deterioration of our Constitution, the state of our free society and our country’s sovereignty. By pushing this issue under the rug, all courts and elected officials thus far have opened the door for the fore mentioned hypothetical.
Barack Hussein Obama has had possibly 4 citizenships governing him thus far in his life: British at birth, Kenyan, Indonesian and possibly American. The later has yet to actually been proven due to the law & the age of his mother at the time of his birth and the lack of any visible/photo proof of his existence prior to being a toddler on his grandfathers shoulders or on a tricycle.
I was born in 1960 and even I have a hospital photo that was taken before I went home to live with my parents. My mother, who was born at home in 1941, has a photo that was within days of her birth. My father, who was born in a hospital in 1940, also has a photo that was taken within days of his birth.
Today, in the age of a renegade, run-a-way Congress and Administration we are suppose to just roll over and accept, from the time of Obama’s birth until he was able to ride a tricycle, there were absolutely “NO” photos taken of him. As John Stossel would say: “give me a break”.
In conclusion, there is but one obvious and unavoidable fact of this day we now live in:
We are truly regressing and thus are once again becoming a nation ruled by “MEN instead of by “LAW”. Our fore fathers surely must be rolling in their graves and shedding tears of utter disappointment at the current state of the “Free Republic” they fought and died for. Should Sotomayor be confirmed it will be of grave concern to our future sovereignty. And, although the words come out of her mouth about the applying the original intent of the framers when making judicial decisions, the passion is not there for those words. Sotomayor’s answers to overturned rulings, answers in which she adamantly stands behind her decisions in those rulings that have been overturned( RICCI case for exp), are in complete contradiction to her fore mentioned answer to Sen. Hatch about adhering and using original intent when deciding cases. It is as if the current White House is somehow feeding her scripted answers to the tough questions to get the pass to and be confirmed.
Constitutionally Speaking 